Navigation

  • What's the Guru Gonna Say Next? Subscribe now.

    RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

    TopRank Reader Poll

    Search

    Categories

     

    On this page

    How Small a Part SEO Plays In Getting a New Site to Dominate SERPs
    Even Internet Marketers Can Understand Latent Semantic Indexing
    The Anti-SEO SEO Guru Asks -- Can You Define SEO?
    Ask the Anti-SEO SEO Guru

    Archive

    Blogroll

    Debra Mastaler
    The Absolute Authority In Link Building for Market Share.
     Fantomaster. A true legend in his own time.
    One of the most intelligent men I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. And quite a looker too in that expensive suit he always wears in public
     Jim Boynkin
    a true in-the-trenches SEO warrior
    Search Engine Optimization Journal
    For their obvious good taste.
    SearchRank Blog
    David Wallace nominated me for an award and I like him !
     SEO Rock Stars
    These are just some of the people I have had the great fortune of meeting, doing business with or just read them all the time because they are either good or entertaining or both. Just do a search for any of these names. Todd Malicoat- Michael Gray- John Andrews- Ed Purkiss- Danny Sullivan - Christine Churchill - Kim Krause- Jenifer Slegg - Jason Duke - Mikkel Svendsen -Ian Mcanerin and more. I wish I could name them al
     Shoemoney
    I don't know of anyone else who has lost so much and gained so much doing it. A man who puts his money where his mouth is.
     Sphinn
    Everybody is doing it!
     Superior SEO insight
    This guy can really open your eyes to the REAL seo world with every post. Excellent!
    Talkndu
    News and Information about Mobile SEO
    The best search news site
    If you can only read one search news site a day searchengineland should be it. Then go Sphinn it!
     This Week in SEO
    Another cool resource to help you remain out standing in your field. Great job guys!
     Wolf-Howl
    the must read blog of a true SEO linking artist

    Disclaimer
    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

    Total Posts: 71
    This Year: 0
    This Month: 0
    This Week: 0
    Comments: 400

    Sign In

     Wednesday, January 21, 2009
    Wednesday, January 21, 2009 6:51:47 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

    I’d say one of the biggest problems SEOs struggle with is that it is all about rankings and traffic, rather than conversions. It’s easy to keep focusing on trying to work the extremes to bring in more visitors when the time might be better spent on ensuring you’re doing better to convert your existing visitors.

    Danny Sullivan  Internet Consulting firm Calafia

     

    I can understand the world paying little attention  to my soapbox preaching about the need for conversions as the ONLY metric of value, BUT when someone in the search marketing industry of Danny Sullivan’s caliber says it, maybe it’s time the world realized the winds of change are blowing.

    **********************************************************************************************************************


    How Small a Part SEO Plays In Getting a New Site to Dominate SERPs

    I have a VERY strict policy of never revealing clients placements or the strategies/techniques I use for their online marketing to a third party without the express permission of my client.  What you and I do is our business and no one else’s. How would you feel if you knew that a competitor had called me and I discussed you and your business with them? Wouldn’t trust me much would you?

    With that said, I hope it comes through on my blog that my intention is not to make myself look smart,(I’m pretty sure that’s obvious at least), or just to toot my own horn.  It is to offer real, from the trenches advise on how to get results in a complicated, information overloaded environment.

    That is not to say I don’t attempt to market myself and Techndu.  I just do it a little differently because I really do believe the more you give, the more you get.  The secret to giving details in terms of generating business for yourself  is  the more details you give, the more sense it makes to outsource the difficult or unappealing processes to someone better suited to the task.

    So, I’m going to share a question I got from a client last week because I think it is a topic that deserves more air time than it gets and I also think few actually know some of the things that I have tested and proven to myself and my clients. I think I can help but I can’t divulge the client or their site or their target terms. Sorry.

    The SEO Guru helped put the Sandbox debate to bed well over a year ago with this post:

    http://massa.techndu.com/2007/08/19/FinallyTheSandboxDebateIsDEADAndTheSEOGuruKilledIt.aspx

    But there still remains the challenge of how to get a brand new site trusted enough to start ranking for it’s top tier terms and how to do it fast. 

    The bottom line is to get people searching for you.

    Question for the Week of September 25th, 2008

    I need to get an estimated time frame and hours estimate for a brand new website. 

    My brother is a salesperson for a city Based Moving Company and he is looking to bring in additional leads on his own…separate from the main website. 

    I plan to create a website for him and then want to and optimize it for the following list of keywords:

    City movers

    city moving companies

    city mover

    city moving company

    city state movers

    movers in city

    city state movers

    moving companies in city

    moving companies city

    moving company city state

    city local movers

    city st  moving companies

     I know this is a pretty competitive market so I want to see if you think we could get top ranking for a brand new website and how long you think it may take.

     Thanks

    David

     

    Hi David. I'm the only one in the office today due to a holiday here in India called Uttarayan http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uttarayana. It's a kite flying celebration and EVERYONE closes and flies kites for two days!

    Anyway, I have a LOT of experience with this type of challenge and actually played a pretty big role in dis-spelling the myth that there was a sandbox. I know a little secret that can get the site producing from brand new to generating traffic within a matter of 8 to 12 weeks.

    Secret #1 is to register the domain for more than 1 year. At least 3
    Secret #2 is to get people searching for the target

    You can expect about 400 -600 hours taking a minimum of 2-3 months. If the budget is there the best option is 200 hours per month so that it is pretty well established and trusted within 3 months but if that is too much strain on the budget then it still works at 50 or 100 hours a month it just takes more months to reach the same objective. Anyway you do it,  you're looking at about 400 -600 hours online/offline.

    Also you need to figure some $1500 - $2000 for hi end directory submissions. Yahoo/ business.com and about 50 or so other paid directories.

    the trick to getting people to search for the company is to
    NOT think SEO and instead think marketing. keep in mind I know NOTHING about the company or it's goals so these things I'm about to mention are only examples for the purpose of illustration.

    Get  your name and a very strong offer in front of as many people as possible and make it ONLY available from the website.
    Here are a couple of things I've done with clients in the past that worked VERY well

    we gave away $200 to local high school seniors that we termed most valuable player of the week and  we would announce the winner on the site every Monday. Then we would give the award AND MAKE SURE THE PRESS WAS THERE. At first we had to shoot our own photos and interview ourselves and write the stories and send it to the papers and all local and neighborhood publications including shoppers and weeklies but within 4 weeks the press was always there. We did a 15 week campaign and by the end of the 15 weeks not only were they getting some 2000 hits EVERY monday, they won some award from the Chamber of commerce, (getting front page press again), and they were placed #1 on dozens of keywords and dominated their local market.

    another one we did was for a  extermination business. They gave away a trip to cozumel to the person who could guess the temperature of a Caribbean resort the day their house was to be scheduled for the  spraying because you had to be out of your house for several hours when they sprayed so the idea was why not take a vacation on us while you have to be gone anyway.


    All they did to advertise was put flyers on bulletin boards at grocery stores and they took a booth at a home show.  Within one year they became the undisputed leader for pest control services in a market of about 2 million.

    I should also mention that they also offered a healthy referral program and set up an email system to send b day greetings and they started a blog about the benefits of pest control by educating people on what to look for to keep bugs and rodents out and not spreading disease. VERY EFFECTIVE ! Several of those articles got picked up online and off.

    So, that is the trick. If people start searching for a specific term or company name that is NOT in the index, trust me, the search engine will start looking for it and put it in! Once it becomes trusted, it will start placing for target terms. This process doesn’t take long either. Especially in local markets.

    Massa

    ****************************************************************

    I had suspected that in a “family deal”, there may be some low end expectations in terms of investment and sure enough, the next day I got this response.

    ****************************************
    Hi Massa,

    Thank you very much for the information.  I will have to get with my brother on this, but I think we will probably have to take much longer on this one because he cannot put that much money into it up front.  So it might be a year long project as opposed to getting rankings within 3.4 months. 

    Thanks

    David

    I figured that David. That's why I mentioned the offline stuff.  If you can think of low cost things to get people hunting you, that is going to cut those online hours needed to about half. I mean it's close to impossible to give solid numbers like 400 hours or cut in half  but the more things you can do that gets people searching for you the less you need the online hours.

    What I suggest is  to come up with 2-3 plans of how to get people hunting for you, (I had a friend in Scotland a few years back that went around Edinburgh putting post it notes in toilets that said BEWARE! and his url. He had over 2000 hits in a week), then do the paid directory submissions then pay us to handle the on site stuff like titles and H tags and that COULD be all it takes.


    sponsor a local special ed sports team in the special Olympics

    shoot moving videos and get them on you tube and then promote it locally

    give coupons to local churches and have them  mention you in their newsletters

    put a banner behind a hot air balloon,(they have them operated by remote control now days), and have it fly over hi population areas especially local sporting events like little league games

    all these things have some degree of cost associated with them but they are one off charges that YOU control making the ding a little more palatable. Plus ---- NEGOTIATE!! It’s pretty unlikely the guy with the remote hot air balloon has a line of people waiting to pay him that day. ;-) 

    BUT be sure  you have some plan for staying in touch with people like sending emails on their birthday and pushing a referral program

    See what I mean? Think more marketing -- less SEO

    bob

    Actually, I believe the best advice I can give ANYBODY is

    Think more marketing – less SEO

    That is actually the secret to traffic AND conversions

     

    Peach Y’all

    The anti seo-SEO Guru

     

     

     

    Your gonna go blind if ya don’t quit sittin so close to that TV damnit!

     

    | | # 
     Sunday, January 18, 2009
    Sunday, January 18, 2009 1:42:55 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

                                                                         If you think Education is expensive – you should try ignorance

     

    As I promised a couple of weeks ago, I’m going to attempt pull back the shroud of mystery that is so often associated with highly complex mathematical concepts to a point that even marketers and Canadians can understand them.

    I learned long ago that sometimes simple concepts the human mind can conceive, turn into a VERY complicated programs when turning that concept into an actual working algorithm. If you are not a scientist involved with Information Retrieval, (IR), then reading the patents and white papers can leave you feeling confused and intimidated.

    So, what I do is read the text of those white papers and patents, (skipping all the math formulas and illustrations), read what some others whom I respect say about those papers, then devise my own testing process derived from I THINK I understand and try it out. Once I prove to myself that I have the “gist” of the concept as it applies to what is important to me, (usually organic, relevant traffic generation),  I’m satisfied that I understand the concept well enough to capitalize and profit from it. It’s not as hard as some might have you believe.

    Today, the "Dumb It Down" anti seo-SEO Guru will de-mystify:

    Latent Semantic Indexing

    LSI has been around for much longer than you’d think. In fact, LSA, (latent semantic analysis), was patented in 1988. But I became aware of it from a man I was lucky enough to call a friend. A very smart man and one of those IR scientist guys I mentioned earlier. He was VERY involved in LSI research and application and he was the one who helped me understand it at a high level and then apply it at a low level. In my experience, when you can learn it high and apply it low, it usually means $.

    His name is Edel Garcia. I haven’t seen him around in a while so I’ve kind of lost touch with him but he still has a great site covering this and related topics and while possibly a little dated, it is still very good foundation kind of info.

    http://www.miislita.com/information-retrieval-tutorial/svd-lsi-tutorial-4-lsi-how-to-calculations.html  

    Ok, let’s get started.

    One of my favorite sites about LSI is http://www.knowledgesearch.org/lsi/lsa_definition.htm

    An excerpt from that page that I feel illustrates the concept pretty well is:

    let's say we use LSI to index our collection of mathematical articles. If the words n-dimensional, manifold and topology appear together in enough articles, the search algorithm will notice that the three terms are semantically close. A search for n-dimensional manifolds will therefore return a set of articles containing that phrase (the same result we would get with a regular search), but also articles that contain just the word topology. The search engine understands nothing about mathematics, but examining a sufficient number of documents teaches it that the three terms are related. It then uses that information to provide an expanded set of results with better recall than a plain keyword search.

    Ignorance is Bliss

    Before we discuss the theoretical underpinnings of LSI, it's worth citing a few actual searches from some sample document collections.

    • In an AP news wire database, a search for Saddam Hussein returns articles on the Gulf War, UN sanctions, the oil embargo, and documents on Iraq that do not contain the Iraqi president's name at all.
    • Looking for articles about Tiger Woods in the same database brings up many stories about the golfer, followed by articles about major golf tournaments that don't mention his name. Constraining the search to days when no articles were written about Tiger Woods still brings up stories about golf tournaments and well-known players.
    • In an image database that uses LSI indexing, a search on Normandy invasion shows images of the Bayeux tapestry - the famous tapestry depicting the Norman invasion of England in 1066, the town of Bayeux, followed by photographs of the English invasion of Normandy in 1944.

    In all these cases LSI is 'smart' enough to see that Saddam Hussein is somehow closely related to Iraq and the Gulf War, that Tiger Woods plays golf, and that Bayeux has close semantic ties to invasions and England. As we will see in our exposition, all of these apparently intelligent connections are artifacts of word use patterns that already exist in our document collection.

     

    Cool ? Not too long of a stretch to grasp huh? BUT what does that tell you about how to build your pages so that you start generating converting traffic from organic results?

    I’m going to give you several links at the end of this post that displays a wide variety of explanations, definitions and opinions that all give you as much depth and insight into the topic as you want to dig for. But when you start looking for what all those definitions mean as it applies to making your competitors suck SERP wind, the list gets pretty short. That’s what I’m trying to help with.

    I’ve read most of them, as painful as many are, and I can save the majority of readers a lot of time and teeth grinding. Boiling all the information down into workable solutions is the key and to do that you don’t need to be a scientist or mathematician. You just have to use your common sense and realize that all these papers were written too satisfy some personal agenda of the author and we can all be pretty sure that agenda had little to do with OUR success.

    So, bottom line, what does all the self serving information tell us as online marketers?

    STAY ON MESSAGE!

    That’s right. Perhaps millions of words online describing a pretty basic process and it all comes down to 3 words. Stay on message.

    I understand how difficult it is to plan out an entire site for the long term. Things change and experience is what we get when we were expecting something else. So even though I am a big supporter of planning and developing objectives and strategies, I’m making it even easier than that. You can do it on a page by page basis and simply spend five minutes thinking about what the new page is about, what is it’s purpose what words best serve that purpose and then stay on message.

    It is really not that different than talking to a few people at the same time. If you had the attention of say half a dozen people for 10 minutes and your objective was to get them to buy a couple of raffle tickets, you may spend a little time talking about the charity you were pitching, maybe a little time talking about yourself to establish trust but the majority of the time you would spend talking about the benefits of them buying the tickets. Why? So they associate the benefits with the product. ASSOCIATE. That’s a big word when it comes to LSI.

    Assuming someone in the group raised their hand and asked a question about some other charity? Would you talk about THAT charity and their benefits? Why would you want to point out the benefits of a different charity? It would confuse the people you just convinced about the benefits of YOUR charity.

    Would you talk about the other charity trying to make them look bad? Again, buy talking about them instead of you, you risk someone disagreeing with you and you lose affinity with them.

    So what is the best route? STAY ON MESSAGE.

    It’s the same with web pages and online content. The only difference is you are not using a vocal medium, you are using a textual and graphical medium.

    So you use the alt tags for graphics to associate words to serve your purpose. You use heading tags, titles, anchor text in links both interior and exterior. You think about what words you want to be put together by the search engine and by the humans reading the words and     STAY ON MESSAGE. If you are talking about plastic surgery, don’t start talking about plastic car parts. Use medical terms, use anatomical terms, use common words and phrases that paint a mental picture of the target topic.

    The next page you build you can talk about anything else you want but on that page, again, talk only about one thing. Use as many words as you like,(the less words you use to get the message clear in the readers mind the better BTW), but only talk about that one thing.

    That’s it. I could elaborate but there is really no need. If you don’t understand staying on topic or if you suffer from ADD or some other affliction that hinders your concentration or focus, then you should seek professional help, but for the mast vajority of us wanting to make a buck online, just focus and stay on message.

     

    Peach Y’all

    The Anti-seo SEO Guru

    References

    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Latent_semantic_analysis

    www.knowledgesearch.org/lsi/lsa_definition.htm

    lsa.colorado.edu/papers/dp1.LSAintro.pdf

    www.freshpatents.com/Scalable-probabilistic-latent-semantic-analysis-dt20071011ptan20070239431.php

     

     

     

    Don’t eat your lunch before you get to school. You won’t have anything to trade for something better and you’ll go hungry!

     

     

      

     

    | | # 
     Wednesday, January 07, 2009
    Wednesday, January 07, 2009 4:19:33 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )
     

                                                          Find the courage to embrace change and fear mediocrity

    Definitions of misnomer on the Web:

    *******************************************************************

    Can You Define SEO? Well, can you? Yeah I thought it would be tough on ya. Don't worry about it, neither can anyone else.

    If you threatened to take away my plate, I guess I would have to say, while there is really no definition for any misnomer, conventional wisdom would likely dictate that SEO generally means actions taken to ensure a webpage secures superior placement in the organic results of a search engine's returned results page for a specific searched term or phrase. If you don't agree, feel free to leave your definition in the comments,(or anywhere you else you care to).

    So my question is ---- Are you SURE that is really all you want?

    What about sales? traffic? Conversions? Changing people's minds to compliment your own biases? 

    Perhaps it's a truism that just being #1 for a keyword is enough to generate traffic, but I would disagree. I used to see a lot of results on search engines at #1 that I didn't click on. Results with title tags like:
    HOTEL. CHEAP HOTEL. CHEAP HOTEL IN LAS VEGAS

    So perhaps the commonly accepted definition should be more like Webpage Title Optimization, WTO.

    But don't we juice up titles with nice ad copy because traffic is more important than placement? Sooooo doesn't that make us more like traffic generation optimizers? TGO?

    I've got some 17 people in production whose primary purpose is to generate traffic from a pretty wide variety of tactics, some having little if anything to do with search engines. I suppose they would almost HAVE to be called TGOs.

    So what happens when those TGOs DO generate traffic but clients cancel because we did what they said they wanted but they are losing money?

    We have 3 people whose primary function is to analyze logs and develop strategies to be given to production, (the TGOs), to alter negative trends. So I guess those are trend analysis for strategy optimization. TASOs.

    We also built a very simple, yet powerful tool that:

     #1. tracks only referrers that actually get hit and points to the ones that don't at a glance. Why waste time and bandwidth, (which are expenses), when what we really need to know is what is getting hit? Number 1 doesn't matter if it does not generate traffic.

     #2. allows you to deliver highly targeted dynamic content on the fly for increased conversions. So --- this is a content delivery optimization tool? CDO?

    But once the strategy is optimized what do we say to make sure the negative trends identified by the TASOs are reversed? What do you say to whom and where?

    We have 5 fulltime copy writers whose primary function is to write content that incites an emotional response from a human being that results in that human taking a desired action. Content Response Optimizers. CROs 

    And that doesn't even include the research factions of this entire process. So which part of that process is seo and not simply everyday, run of the mill internet marketing?

    I doubt any of my offered acronyms will ever catch on. Probably because they actually describe the actions being taken. Also, please note, out of all of that, we do not have a single resource devoted to optimizing,(or doing anything else to), any search engine. SEO.

    My point is that if all you really want is placement then seo may be a viable option BUT the fee should not reflect a total solution. Search engine placement, traffic generation, marketing research, metrics analysis, ad content delivery, etc. all those things are NOT about search engines, they are about people! Human beings capable of an emotional response. THAT is a total solution.

    Traffic generation is certainly one aspect of a total solution but the rates are not inline with the actual value in a lot of cases.

    Search Engine Spam White Paper

    Almost a decade ago, a certain Alan Perkins wrote what he termed a White Paper called The Classification of Search Engine Spam

    In spite of the fact that the “white paper” was totally unsubstantiated, unproven, unendorsed and quite frankly in my opinion, trite, it still gained a fairly sizeable degree of acceptance online. The gist of the article was, “any technique used that would NOT be used if search engines did not exist is search engine spam”.

    While I never accepted this self-aggrandizing rant as a “white paper”, there is a valid point if it was only worded a little differently.

    Bear in mind, I do not believe there is any such thing as search engine spam other than what search engines themselves promote to place the blame for their own lack of efficiency onto third parties they like to portray as an evil nemesis of fair and unbiased results,(what a load of crap! If you think results are fair and unbiased, you are either blind or crazy).

    BUT, if the gist of “white paper” was more like, “search engines are only a tool and all that really matters is people”, now THAT statement I could wholeheartedly endorse.

    As an illustration I’d like to share an email I received 2 days ago from an online marketer of note in his own right. He happens to be a client of mine and the email he sent me is a very good example of how to do business online without relying on search engine placement directly and instead relying on that human emotional response thing.

    It is the :

    SECRET TO GETTING HI-POWERED LINKS WITHOUT HAVING TO PAY FOR THEM.

     
    I have a very strict policy that we NEVER reveal our clients, their clients, their placements or what techniques we used to get those placements without the client giving me written permission to do so. You’ll see in this letter from Eric Werner of Atlanta Click Advisor that I have such permission. I’ve changed nothing in the letter and it is displayed as it was offered to me.

    *******************************************************************

    Please take this and use it however you’d like. When I wrote it I was thinking that you might like to make it a blog post or part of a blog post, but feel free to add to it, subtract from it, cut it up or not cut it up and use it in any way you’d like or don’t use it at all if it’s not a good fit.

     

    If you’d like to link to my blog in the last paragraph you can use the anchor text ‘adwords marketing’ and point it to www.Atlantaclickadvisor.com although I won’t be slighted in the least if you decide not to.

     

    Every part of this is true and I really wanted to thank you and your staff for everything.

     

    I’ve also attached a version in word format.

     

    Bob,

     

    I just wanted to take a moment to let you know what an impact you've made over the course of the last year. Choosing to use your SEO (Valuable Traffic Generation) services has aided in our tremendous success this year and I can say I honestly don't know what I would have done without the help of your staff. They have been responsive, flexible, and have definitely demonstrated the ability to get the job done.

     

    One of the best case studies I have is for one of the clients you have helped us with. I wanted to share some of the results with you and your readers in case anyone had any question about the quality of real results that you provide.

     

    A couple weeks ago when Google Analytics introduced advanced segmentation I decided to create a segment showing how non-brand related organic traffic has grown throughout the year. I think that the non-brand related traffic is telling because almost all of it is attributable to the work your team did.

     

     

     

     

    Remarkable in itself, of course it begs the question:

     

    Does this traffic convert into new business? I developed this second report which shows that the conversion rate remained steadily positive throughout. The orange line is the conversion rate from non brand related traffic. In my opinion this demonstrates the inarguable value of the service and reinforces your statement about producing valuable traffic rather than just rankings.

     

     

    Beyond all of that I wanted to point out that the personal advice you've given me on multiple occasions has helped to shape my professional development and the way I think about my personal web presence and the web as a whole. Everything you've suggested has paid off more than I would have imagined and I really believe that the web would be a much better place if more people brought the integrity to their work that you bring to yours.

     

    I hope that you continue to be wildly successful this year and continue spread that success to everyone you touch. It has been a great adjunct to my Adwords marketing efforts and I hope that you will turn to me any time you need a referral or a recommendation because I couldn't be happier with the way your services continue to improve.

    ************************************************************


    THAT is an emotional response! So what is the secret?

    THERE IS NO SECRET.  Anyone can do it and it really has very little to do with SEO. It has to do with exceeding the customers’ expectations. It has to do with hard work, commitment to excellence and living the Do Philosophy.

    Do the best job you can do

    Be proud of what you do

    Do what you say you will do

    And charge accordingly

    Is that SEO or is that online marketing?

    So, did any of that help you to define SEO?

     

    Peach Y’all

    The ask the anti-seo seo guru

     

     

     

     

    Never hide your dirty picture books under the bed. That’s always the first place they look!  

     

     

     

     



    | | # 
     Friday, January 02, 2009
    Friday, January 02, 2009 8:04:27 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

    Guru  -- India A teacher or a wise man.
    www.britishempire.co.uk/glossary/g.htm

    A guru is a person who is regarded as having great knowledge, wisdom and authority in a given area, and uses it to guide others. ...
    en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guru

     

    As the term “Guru” relates to teaching, in that context then I must be a guru. I have certainly done my share of teaching,(training is probably a more accurate term), over my last 12 years in the online promotion business.

    As it relates to wisdom ----- ahhhh, not so much.

     

    My New Year’s Resolution for ‘09

    To stop arguing over the use of SEO, the world’s most egregious misnomer, but to try even harder to de-mystify the process the term universally applies to for the people who choose to read what I write.

    Again, my purpose is to simply teach. Not to teach what I do as much as to teach what I believe. I’ve said many, many times that we are all free to believe what we choose and if you don’t exercise that freedom – you lose! So I can give you a shovel, put you must do your own digging.

    So, I’m no longer going to engage in any more debates or arguments to defend my position or philosophy. I will simply state it and leave it to you to use what you like and poo-poo what you don’t.

    I’m not going to argue about it anymore because most of those I would argue with either

    #1. I have a great deal of respect for and wish to do nothing that may cause anyone to lose their respect for me or mine for them.

    #2. Are so desperately clinging to a falsehood for the sole purpose of trying to elicit validation that arguing is akin to engaging in a battle of wits with an unarmed opponent.

    Never try to teach a pig to sing. It wastes your time and annoys the pig.

    It’s been almost 3 months since I last posted but I waited for today for three basic reasons.

    #1. It’s the first work day of the new year and a good time to make a major shift in my presentation and online persona

    #2. I was seriously considering stopping blogging as an SEO  as I was going through a severe moral dilemma. I find the term offensive now and did not wish to continue promoting it. I’ve never liked it and have long thought it was the primary cause of so much derision within it’s own community and also the cause for such negative associations with the process of online marketing.

    But this past year it has gotten harder and harder to watch the almost constant petty bickering  at places such as Sphinn.com and the countless circular debates at almost every open platform that attracts those who call themselves by that misnomer.

    I believe it has long been becoming more of a detriment rather than an asset to be associated with the term and as online marketing matures, I feel so should the people involved with it and that applies to the majority of those calling themselves SEO’s. We may be an expert at IR, we may have exceptional skills in conversion acceleration, we may even be able to capture huge audiences on twitter but none of those things does anything to optimize any search engine.

    #3. I’ve been working diligently on a program that is a customer reporting tool and activity management system for an online promotion service business. It is broken into two primary sections. One is for reporting activities related to traffic generation and the other is to help analyze metrics for the purpose of increasing conversions.  

    There are many products on the web that does one or the other but to my view they are always loaded with a lot of data that never, (or at least rarely enough to make them virtually useless), really help actually generate revenue.

    This program is streamlined to focus on data that you can actually use NOW to increase conversions and see at a glance what you are doing wrong if the numbers aren’t where they should be.

    It is also built to be proactive rather than re-active. Most analytics show you who, what, when and where but don’t give you anything to use to do something about it. This is the program I’ve used in many forms for many, many years to enable me to deliver dynamic content related to a known referrer on the fly while being totally transparent in the traffic generation department. It is one of the primary reasons my business flourishes while I spend very little time in social circles promoting myself.

    To me THAT is what online marketing is all about. Traffic generation and conversions. NOT SEO. SEO’s do NOT OPTIMZE SEARCH ENGINES as the acronym implies and that is at the heart of the problem with the negative image and the negative display of etiquette between members of the same tribe.

    I’m finished calling what I do something that I do not do. I’m not finished with it to invalidate anyone or question their abilities. I’m finished with it because it is misleading, has no real reason to exist and simply because it is wrong.

    I’m going to use the next few posts to de-mystify some of the terms and pseudo intellectual labels that get thrown around trying to impress others with the depth of the throw aroundees level of knowledge in the field of “real” seo, (sorry for the quotation marks but that phrase always kills me!). The brutal truth is that there is actually no such thing as REAL SEO. There are things like LSI - behavioral metrics – geo-targeting – personalization – blended results etc, but none of those things have anything to do with optimizing a search engine and you have no real reason to fear or be intimidated by any of them. Besides, you can believe me when I tell you that if I can do it, ANYONE can do it and it ain’t that hard.

    Always remember three simple, basic concepts and you will do fine promoting your site and your client's sites without having to get a degree in any of those academic disciplines.

    #1. All search engines programs are written by human beings. Those algorithms reflect the opinions, biases, likes and dislikes of the people doing the programming.  In other words, search engines promoters like you to believe that search engines think and act like very smart  people. But the reality is they do not think at all. They only do what they are told to do by humans with a real human agenda. Complete with all the virtues and frailities.

    #2. A search engine’s primary purpose is NOT to deliver relevancy. A search engine’s primary purpose is to deliver revenue. That is not the same thing.

    #3.  Targeted traffic is NOT the hard part. Conversions are. If you need traffic – hell – just buy it. A lot of time, (most of the time?),it’s cheaper anyway.

    Traffic generation has much more to do with effective management than it does IR-LSI-behavioral metrics-blah-blah-blah.

    Finally a question for you.

    Why do you think you want SEO?

    Whatever you answered you are wrong. No one NEEDS SEO. Every commercial site on the web NEEDS customers and revenue and you sell to people not machines. You are never going to sell anything to a search engine. Even an optimized one.

     

    Peach Y’all

    The anti seo seo guru

     

    RELATED REFERENCES

    http://videos.webpronews.com/2008/12/29/ses-chicago-bruce-clay-revisits-his-ranking-is-dead-statement/

    http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/2008/11/18/what-googles-matt-cutts-sees-in-2009

    http://www.davidnaylor.co.uk/seo-ranking-reports-dead.html

     

     

     

    Damnit! Did you drink all the kool aid except for one tiny little sip and then put the pitcher back?

     

    | | #