Navigation

  • What's the Guru Gonna Say Next? Subscribe now.

    RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

    TopRank Reader Poll

    Search

    Categories

     

    On this page

    How to Beat the 3 Second Back Button Boogie
    Search Engines Don’t Take People Where the Search Engine Wants Them To Go

    Archive

    Blogroll

    Debra Mastaler
    The Absolute Authority In Link Building for Market Share.
     Fantomaster. A true legend in his own time.
    One of the most intelligent men I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. And quite a looker too in that expensive suit he always wears in public
     Jim Boynkin
    a true in-the-trenches SEO warrior
    Search Engine Optimization Journal
    For their obvious good taste.
    SearchRank Blog
    David Wallace nominated me for an award and I like him !
     SEO Rock Stars
    These are just some of the people I have had the great fortune of meeting, doing business with or just read them all the time because they are either good or entertaining or both. Just do a search for any of these names. Todd Malicoat- Michael Gray- John Andrews- Ed Purkiss- Danny Sullivan - Christine Churchill - Kim Krause- Jenifer Slegg - Jason Duke - Mikkel Svendsen -Ian Mcanerin and more. I wish I could name them al
     Shoemoney
    I don't know of anyone else who has lost so much and gained so much doing it. A man who puts his money where his mouth is.
     Sphinn
    Everybody is doing it!
     Superior SEO insight
    This guy can really open your eyes to the REAL seo world with every post. Excellent!
    Talkndu
    News and Information about Mobile SEO
    The best search news site
    If you can only read one search news site a day searchengineland should be it. Then go Sphinn it!
     This Week in SEO
    Another cool resource to help you remain out standing in your field. Great job guys!
     Wolf-Howl
    the must read blog of a true SEO linking artist

    Disclaimer
    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

    Total Posts: 71
    This Year: 0
    This Month: 0
    This Week: 0
    Comments: 400

    Sign In

     Wednesday, February 25, 2009
    Wednesday, February 25, 2009 6:15:30 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

    Guruisms for the week of 23-02-09


    Technological progress has merely provided us with more efficient means for going backwards.

    Aldous Huxley

     07/26/1894 - 11/22/1963
    English critic & novelist.  Author of Brave New World, one of my favorites.

    Sometimes we get so enthralled with the hype and hope of technology, we forget the present reality that technology has no value if it does not serve mankind for the better.

    It’s all about the sale and NOT the software..

    Search Engines don’t buy shit!  But humans do.   

    Sex Sells --- to people looking to buy sex. The same principle applies to refrigerators.

    The Anti-seo SEO Guru

     cynic and  unemployed politician

     

     The True Cost of SEO

    While there are a great many heated debates regarding the scope of what SEO entails, it is generally accepted, (that means not argued over much in SEO communities),that SEO’s basic function is the traffic generation from organic, (mistakenly used to imply free), search engine results. The truth, while admittedly brutal for some, is that more times than not, traffic generation is more cost effective if you simply buy it. PPC has it’s merits.

    That statement may seem odd coming from a man who has capitalized significantly on “organic” placements but it is only because I am one of that small percentage of netizens who actually does know the real cost of those “free” placements.  That voice of experience is telling you the truth now; whether paying for PPC, purchasing  prospects from affiliates, or hiring the assistance of an SEO ---- you ARE paying for traffic. Well, --- If you got lucky and hired the right seo anyway. If not, then you’re just paying.

    Would you like to know the secret of figuring out the true cost of SEO for yourself?

     It’s ROI. Return on Investment

    THAT is what establishes the value of traffic. Duh! We all knew that right? Then why are there so many really crappy websites all scrambling for top spots?

    The truth is that all traffic, regardless of where it came from, is worth something. At the very least, an effort. But the word something is a very broad, very subjective term.

    I may be running the risk of a death sentence by the grammar police here but I feel this MUST be said. To me ----

    It ain’t worth a squirt if it don’t convert

    Your business will die if they don’t buy

    If it don’t convert – it don’t work

    Learn to convert - It doesn't hurt

    Made my point yet?

    So I’ve conceded, all traffic, ANY traffic, does have some inherent value. However, if you are  able to use logic to come to a conclusion and are able to rise above the din of the blinded few, then maybe you can agree with me that those 4 grammatically flawed euphemisms above have value as well.

    If you can agree that the end goal of any traffic generating strategy should be increased conversions, (hopefully resulting in increased profits), then the idea of increasing conversions has to have at least equal appeal to increased seo, (whatever that is),efforts.

    Think about this.

    If your site enjoys an average conversion rate of .05%, meaning 1 out of every 200 unique hits converts to a desired action, then which is better in terms of return? Increasing traffic to 1000 unique hits to get 5 sales, OR increase conversions to say 10% or 20 orders out of every 200 hits?

    WHOA THERE COWKID, we’re not through thinkin yet.

    What would you think the cost of generating 5 times more traffic would be compared to increasing conversions to 10 %?

    Now, which approach do YOU think makes more sense?

    The reality is that whether you think more traffic or more conversions is better ---- you’re right! I’m not trying to argue or put your mindset into a spin. It’s your site, your business and your money. Spend your time and money any way you feel is best for you and guess what? You’re doing the right thing --- for you anyway.

    For me, I’ve found it exponentially less expensive to increase conversions IF you can afford it. Once you know you can convert, THEN spend money on generating more traffic. If you go about it that way, you should actually have revenue to invest generated from your efforts instead of stolen from your mom’s purse. (vague adolescent reference added so you don’t think I’m talking about you ;-) . If you don’t have generated revenue from your efforts then you lose more money with each passing day and more traffic is only going to make you lose more money faster.

    3 Second Back Button Boogie Defined

    When an internet user elects to click a link from a source document, be it a search engine, an email, a blog or forum, it is a conscious act. To use an index finger to push a mouse button indicates a response to an emotional stimulus. It indicates the expectation of finding data related to that stimulus at the destination.

    In other words, when someone clicks a link they are expecting to find something that relates to the specific reason they clicked the link in the first place.

    When they reach you as a destination, you have about 3 seconds to deliver EXACTLY what that user expected to find or they will likely hit the back button and return to the source document. Hence - the 3 second back button boogie. 

     

      So How Do I Stop the 3 Second Back Button Boogie?

    The concept is simple, the application --- ahhhhh, not so much.

    If you are converting at 3% or less, you are going to have an increasingly difficult time maintaining your margins for the long term if that model depends on generating more and more traffic.  I know, I know, we all read on seo frogs, (forums and blogs), that so and so has been #1 for years or that the “other” guy just doesn’t REALLY know seo. Well, I DO really know seo, (whatever that is), and I also know that webmasters and programmers no longer rule the cyber roost. The cowboy site jockeys of yesterday have traded in their undershorts and bathrobes for Birkenstocks, (http://www.birkenstockusa.com/), and their khaki colored cargo shorts while punching the clock at their 9 to 5 for the suits. As in all things media, eventually, marketing rules. Maybe that is as it should be. Whether it should or not, it does.

    The web is getting more competitive every day and each day we see it becoming a battleground with better trained, better equipped, better financed warriors. AND, the more profit there is in your I-only-need-a-2%-conversion-rate-to-make-a-profit web service, the more that targeted traffic is going to cost AND the cheaper your corporate competitors are going to be selling the same goodie as you. YIKES! Not a pretty picture huh?

    So what are we to do? Hire the next SEO who talks about metrics without telling you what to DO about them once you analyze them?  Hire $500 an hour consultants to tell you to post more on twitter? Give up and go back to environmental engineering?

    HERE’S AN IDEA. WHY NOT LEARN HOW TO INCREASE CONVERSIONS?

    All is not gloom and doom. Yes it is going to get more and more competitive and you are going to have to learn to figure your ROI to know how far you want to go and in which direction, but it’s not that hard.

    I know you don’t have to look very far on the net to find articles and posts, (or if it is an seo community, childish name calling and circle jerks of the textual persuasion), extolling the virtues of metrics and analytics. AND they are virtuous indeed. The problem comes in when asking, “ok, I see I have 9% of my hits coming from Zimbabwe, and 22% of those come in between 1400 and 1700 hours, soooooo now what”? It’s the now what that doesn’t get talked about too much.

    Well, I’m going to talk about the now what. Figuring out how to use ANY information you can get to increase conversions doesn’t have to be that hard. It CAN be as hard, (and as in-depth and expensive), as you let it be and the more you can afford the better, BUT you don’t have to be a MNC,(multi national corporation), to be able to analyze data to develop a strategy and then execute effectively. Worried about doing it right? Don’t worry,#1. You can’t do it wrong because if you do, your numbers go down. #2. If your numbers go down stop doing that  

    The great thing about the net is that those kind of numbers used to cost a LOT of money thereby raising the cost of the service or product being sold. Corporates still spend a GREAT deal of money on those kinds of numbers, (but it is changing), which gives you at least a small advantage.

    Now it is so cheap that any single mom sitting in her underwear, (ummm, give me a minute here until I get this image out of my head), at her computer can compete with all the money and power any corporate can bring to bear when it comes to research, data organization and analytics within her market. Again, the trick is what to do about the numbers you get.

    You can trust me when I tell you, If I can do it, ANYBODY can do it.

    In my forthcoming blogstallments, I’ll tell you how I use referrer based ad delivery, subliminal messaging, learning curves, superstition and religion to increase conversions at a minimal cost and without needing another four years of college.

     

    Kem cho Y’all

    (I’m an Okie learning to speak Gujarati)

    MAJAMA

     

    The Guru

     

     

    I’d like to leave you today with some wise words my Mother told me as a young boy. I hope it serves you as well as it has served me over the years.

    Boy, if you don’t stop flipping that gawddamn clicker I’m going to slap your ears off!

     

     

     

    | | # 
     Monday, February 16, 2009
    Monday, February 16, 2009 2:19:05 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

     

    We would accomplish many more things if we did not think of them as impossible.
    Vince Lombardi   

     

    I was more impressed with the technology of search back in 1996 than I am today.

    When I first started playing around with Infoseek, Excite, Alta Vista, Hot Bot, Webcrawler,(well, Ok. Webcrawler and Open Text --- not so much), and the other now rotting carcasses of failed search based ad delivery systems, I was blown away.

    Millions of pieces of data organized in a somewhat logical framework. Pages were often indexed within minutes. Scalability seemed endless as each day they all grew by hundreds of thousands of documents.

    You could cross reference. You could research. You could locate data that could fill the largest libraries on the planet from the comfort of your chair and without having to have a library card or pay late fees. It was amazing.

    Granted it was all text based. Period, (and even back then we all knew that would change), and the algorithms were far too elementary. I mean if a guy like me could figure them out ----- weeeelllllll

    As for online promotion and search marketing, I actually did fall off a log once when I was a kid and placing on Infoseek for MLM, credit cards and online poker was easier. And took about as long.

    One of the first things that bothered me about search engines was the way they forced terrible conversions. Back then the index page reigned supreme and if your meta refresh tags were done properly,(what an oxy-moron), your domain name could pop up in top 10 for literally hundreds of related terms. Shoes.com could place #2 for gold shoelaces when the shoes.com/goldshoelaces.html page was three levels deep.

    From a marketers viewpoint, it wasn’t all bad. I mean which is better

    1000 hits with a 1% conversion

    Or 100 hits with a 10% conversion?

    Answer ---WHO CARES!

    It wasn’t until 1998/99 that “doorway pages” started coming into fashion. Not because they didn’t make sense before, but because engines were starting to realize that humans had too many choices of where to look for data and if they did not deliver a better perception of relevancy for specific searches, the aforementioned human would simply move on to Excite, or Hot Bot or Northern Lights, (one of the first to actually invest money in an attempt to raise the bar on relevancy).  So they all got better at reading text and comparing it to a text based query and voila! A cloaked, automated doorway page CRAParama was unleashed upon the straining storage resources of all search engines, major and minor alike.

    That Was Then and This Is Now

    Then came Google and the world changed.

    To be perfectly honest, I have always been much more impressed by Google’s marketing prowess than with the quality of their search engine based on page rank. We had noticed Alta Vista was working with link analysis before Google had even started selling ads. What Google did was actually make it work. But even back then with only 50 or so Phd’s, I kind of expected a little more.

    So now Google has become the undisputed leader. Fine. And once PR was refined a little and then reverse engineered a lot by the same people who had figured out the text based stuff that came before Page Rank, and then some hick from Oklahoma started marketing links, (boy, did THAT piss off Google!), PR started working for individual interior pages based on a combination of text plus all that democratic nature of the web crap.

    MORE CRAPARAMA!

    Now it actually became even easier to auto-generate the kind of content we have all come to accept.

    {grab a suitcase – we’re going on a side trip}

    The above scenario is just one of the many reasons that I assert there is really no such thing as search engine spam.  While the engines may not have invented the term,  they certainly jumped on the self promotional bandwagon and made crap not only easy but revenue generating as well.  Search engine spam survives only as the engines allow.


    So to me, I have never been amazed by anything that has happened and called a leap forward within the search engines self promotional press releases, “leaks” or blatant blog posts as I was when I first visited Infoseek some 13 years ago.

    Even taking into account all the social media hype, buying, (or rather gobbling), up a lot of tech companies, tracking and analyzing everything you do online, (and off BTW), and delivering personalized, geo targeted, demographically influenced results for every search,(Still only a glimmer in some ad salesman’s eye but coming at a blinding pace), those things are all about improving an AD DELIVERY experience and not a searching and FINDING relevant to a specific query experience.

    That actually doesn’t bother me in the least. In fact, it is the way it should be except for one little aspect. The proportion of profit to relevancy improvement is getting a little out of whack.

    The ad buying, delivering and tracking technology seems to be progressing at an incredible rate. I am as amazed at how fast the ad delivery systems are improving as I was when I first started diddleing  Infoseek.

    So, ready to have your gears shpunn?

    It’s because of the focus on ad delivery that any engine attempts to improve relevancy. Why? Because you finding answers to your queries is what keeps you from looking somewhere else for the answer and you looking THERE is what offers the opportunity to display ads that they have spent much time, money and energy trying to learn which one YOU are most likely to respond to with a click of your cyber wallet.

    What this means to anyone who cares to look is a huge shift in conventional wisdom thinking.

    Conventional wisdom has us all trying to build pages that satisfy a search engine’s algorithm to determine relevancy. That is all based around the concept that

    #1. Relevancy is all that matters to a search engine when in fact REVENUE is all that matters and that makes the machine an ad delivery system and not a relevancy delivery system

    #2. That a search engine takes humans where the search engine tells them is the best place for the human to go.

    The truth is:

     HUMANS tell the SEARCH ENGINES where to go

    I know that is going to be VERY difficult for some to accept and that is fine. There is nothing wrong with most people trying to satisfy search engines and thinking that you can influence a search machine any easier than you can influence a water pik!

    Sure you can twist some screws, add thicker wires to deliver more current, and even replace the head to make it sphinn the opposite way. But at the end of the day, it is still going to squirt water between your teeth because that is what it was built to do. If it doesn't - it's broke!

    Search engines are built to deliver revenue generating advertisements to HUMANS and that is why the secret to ultimate domination of organic traffic generating placements is to remember that search engines follow HUMANS and not the other way around.

    You may be thinking, so – which came first the chicken or the egg. How do I get organic search traffic if I have to get people searching for me in the first place?

    It’s not as hard as you think. Influencing people is actually cheaper, faster and easier than trying to influence search engines. http://www.seobook.com/archives/001819.shtml

    I’m close to finishing my next blog post called  “How To Beat the 3 Second Back Button Boogie”. In that article I’ll start showing you ways to get people to force the engines to follow them and it can start with what you do with people when they get to your site. That is one of the easiest ways to start understanding the concept that search engines follow people!

     

    Peach Y’all

    The anti-seo seo Guru

     

     

     

     

    I swear daddy I don’t know what happened to your magazines that were under your tool box out in the garage

            

     

    | | #