Navigation

  • What's the Guru Gonna Say Next? Subscribe now.

    RSS 2.0 | Atom 1.0 | CDF

    TopRank Reader Poll

    Search

    Categories

     

    On this page

    Search Engines Don’t Take People Where the Search Engine Wants Them To Go
    Behavioral Metrics Analysis For the Worried SEO

    Archive

    Blogroll

    Debra Mastaler
    The Absolute Authority In Link Building for Market Share.
     Fantomaster. A true legend in his own time.
    One of the most intelligent men I have ever had the pleasure of knowing. And quite a looker too in that expensive suit he always wears in public
     Jim Boynkin
    a true in-the-trenches SEO warrior
    Search Engine Optimization Journal
    For their obvious good taste.
    SearchRank Blog
    David Wallace nominated me for an award and I like him !
     SEO Rock Stars
    These are just some of the people I have had the great fortune of meeting, doing business with or just read them all the time because they are either good or entertaining or both. Just do a search for any of these names. Todd Malicoat- Michael Gray- John Andrews- Ed Purkiss- Danny Sullivan - Christine Churchill - Kim Krause- Jenifer Slegg - Jason Duke - Mikkel Svendsen -Ian Mcanerin and more. I wish I could name them al
     Shoemoney
    I don't know of anyone else who has lost so much and gained so much doing it. A man who puts his money where his mouth is.
     Sphinn
    Everybody is doing it!
     Superior SEO insight
    This guy can really open your eyes to the REAL seo world with every post. Excellent!
    Talkndu
    News and Information about Mobile SEO
    The best search news site
    If you can only read one search news site a day searchengineland should be it. Then go Sphinn it!
     This Week in SEO
    Another cool resource to help you remain out standing in your field. Great job guys!
     Wolf-Howl
    the must read blog of a true SEO linking artist

    Disclaimer
    The opinions expressed herein are my own personal opinions and do not represent my employer's view in anyway.

    Send mail to the author(s) E-mail

    Total Posts: 71
    This Year: 0
    This Month: 0
    This Week: 0
    Comments: 400

    Sign In

     Monday, February 16, 2009
    Monday, February 16, 2009 2:19:05 AM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

     

    We would accomplish many more things if we did not think of them as impossible.
    Vince Lombardi   

     

    I was more impressed with the technology of search back in 1996 than I am today.

    When I first started playing around with Infoseek, Excite, Alta Vista, Hot Bot, Webcrawler,(well, Ok. Webcrawler and Open Text --- not so much), and the other now rotting carcasses of failed search based ad delivery systems, I was blown away.

    Millions of pieces of data organized in a somewhat logical framework. Pages were often indexed within minutes. Scalability seemed endless as each day they all grew by hundreds of thousands of documents.

    You could cross reference. You could research. You could locate data that could fill the largest libraries on the planet from the comfort of your chair and without having to have a library card or pay late fees. It was amazing.

    Granted it was all text based. Period, (and even back then we all knew that would change), and the algorithms were far too elementary. I mean if a guy like me could figure them out ----- weeeelllllll

    As for online promotion and search marketing, I actually did fall off a log once when I was a kid and placing on Infoseek for MLM, credit cards and online poker was easier. And took about as long.

    One of the first things that bothered me about search engines was the way they forced terrible conversions. Back then the index page reigned supreme and if your meta refresh tags were done properly,(what an oxy-moron), your domain name could pop up in top 10 for literally hundreds of related terms. Shoes.com could place #2 for gold shoelaces when the shoes.com/goldshoelaces.html page was three levels deep.

    From a marketers viewpoint, it wasn’t all bad. I mean which is better

    1000 hits with a 1% conversion

    Or 100 hits with a 10% conversion?

    Answer ---WHO CARES!

    It wasn’t until 1998/99 that “doorway pages” started coming into fashion. Not because they didn’t make sense before, but because engines were starting to realize that humans had too many choices of where to look for data and if they did not deliver a better perception of relevancy for specific searches, the aforementioned human would simply move on to Excite, or Hot Bot or Northern Lights, (one of the first to actually invest money in an attempt to raise the bar on relevancy).  So they all got better at reading text and comparing it to a text based query and voila! A cloaked, automated doorway page CRAParama was unleashed upon the straining storage resources of all search engines, major and minor alike.

    That Was Then and This Is Now

    Then came Google and the world changed.

    To be perfectly honest, I have always been much more impressed by Google’s marketing prowess than with the quality of their search engine based on page rank. We had noticed Alta Vista was working with link analysis before Google had even started selling ads. What Google did was actually make it work. But even back then with only 50 or so Phd’s, I kind of expected a little more.

    So now Google has become the undisputed leader. Fine. And once PR was refined a little and then reverse engineered a lot by the same people who had figured out the text based stuff that came before Page Rank, and then some hick from Oklahoma started marketing links, (boy, did THAT piss off Google!), PR started working for individual interior pages based on a combination of text plus all that democratic nature of the web crap.

    MORE CRAPARAMA!

    Now it actually became even easier to auto-generate the kind of content we have all come to accept.

    {grab a suitcase – we’re going on a side trip}

    The above scenario is just one of the many reasons that I assert there is really no such thing as search engine spam.  While the engines may not have invented the term,  they certainly jumped on the self promotional bandwagon and made crap not only easy but revenue generating as well.  Search engine spam survives only as the engines allow.


    So to me, I have never been amazed by anything that has happened and called a leap forward within the search engines self promotional press releases, “leaks” or blatant blog posts as I was when I first visited Infoseek some 13 years ago.

    Even taking into account all the social media hype, buying, (or rather gobbling), up a lot of tech companies, tracking and analyzing everything you do online, (and off BTW), and delivering personalized, geo targeted, demographically influenced results for every search,(Still only a glimmer in some ad salesman’s eye but coming at a blinding pace), those things are all about improving an AD DELIVERY experience and not a searching and FINDING relevant to a specific query experience.

    That actually doesn’t bother me in the least. In fact, it is the way it should be except for one little aspect. The proportion of profit to relevancy improvement is getting a little out of whack.

    The ad buying, delivering and tracking technology seems to be progressing at an incredible rate. I am as amazed at how fast the ad delivery systems are improving as I was when I first started diddleing  Infoseek.

    So, ready to have your gears shpunn?

    It’s because of the focus on ad delivery that any engine attempts to improve relevancy. Why? Because you finding answers to your queries is what keeps you from looking somewhere else for the answer and you looking THERE is what offers the opportunity to display ads that they have spent much time, money and energy trying to learn which one YOU are most likely to respond to with a click of your cyber wallet.

    What this means to anyone who cares to look is a huge shift in conventional wisdom thinking.

    Conventional wisdom has us all trying to build pages that satisfy a search engine’s algorithm to determine relevancy. That is all based around the concept that

    #1. Relevancy is all that matters to a search engine when in fact REVENUE is all that matters and that makes the machine an ad delivery system and not a relevancy delivery system

    #2. That a search engine takes humans where the search engine tells them is the best place for the human to go.

    The truth is:

     HUMANS tell the SEARCH ENGINES where to go

    I know that is going to be VERY difficult for some to accept and that is fine. There is nothing wrong with most people trying to satisfy search engines and thinking that you can influence a search machine any easier than you can influence a water pik!

    Sure you can twist some screws, add thicker wires to deliver more current, and even replace the head to make it sphinn the opposite way. But at the end of the day, it is still going to squirt water between your teeth because that is what it was built to do. If it doesn't - it's broke!

    Search engines are built to deliver revenue generating advertisements to HUMANS and that is why the secret to ultimate domination of organic traffic generating placements is to remember that search engines follow HUMANS and not the other way around.

    You may be thinking, so – which came first the chicken or the egg. How do I get organic search traffic if I have to get people searching for me in the first place?

    It’s not as hard as you think. Influencing people is actually cheaper, faster and easier than trying to influence search engines. http://www.seobook.com/archives/001819.shtml

    I’m close to finishing my next blog post called  “How To Beat the 3 Second Back Button Boogie”. In that article I’ll start showing you ways to get people to force the engines to follow them and it can start with what you do with people when they get to your site. That is one of the easiest ways to start understanding the concept that search engines follow people!

     

    Peach Y’all

    The anti-seo seo Guru

     

     

     

     

    I swear daddy I don’t know what happened to your magazines that were under your tool box out in the garage

            

     

    | | # 
     Monday, February 02, 2009
    Monday, February 02, 2009 10:57:41 PM (Eastern Standard Time, UTC-05:00) ( )

    This may seem simple, but you need to give customers what they want, not what you think they want. And, if you do this, people will keep coming back.
    John Ilhan  

     

     

    No wonder so many who call themselves SEO’s are worried about their future what with all the talk this past few months of personalized results, bounce rates and changing search parameters. There is no question the organic search results landscape is changing and behavioral metrics analysis is playing some part in that change. But, as online marketers, what does that really mean and what can we do about it?

    Understanding a concept such as behavioral metrics analysis isn’t too tough. Tracking and analyzing which people do what, when and how often to try to determine their future response to a specific problem or opportunity. For our purposes that simply means which ad they are most likely to respond to when based on past historical behavior.

    BUT, that’s the concept as it’s spoken of in SEO circles.  What is the academic definition? Well here is how Wikipedia defines it:

    Search results

    From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    You searched for behavioral metrics analysis (all pages starting with "behavioral metrics analysis" | all pages that link to "behavioral metrics analysis")

    Jump to: navigation, search

    No article title matches

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Search?search=behavioral+metrics+analysis&go=Go

     

    HMMM, maybe this will help clear it up:

    On Behavioral Metric for Probabilistic Systems: Definition and Approximation Algorithm
    Taolue Chen; Tingting Han; Jian Lu
    Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery, 2007. FSKD 2007. Fourth International Conference on
    Volume 2, Issue , 24-27 Aug. 2007 Page(s):21 - 25
    Digital Object Identifier   10.1109/FSKD.2007.426
    Summary:In this paper, we consider the behavioral pseudometrics for probabilistic systems. The model we are interested in is probabilistic automata, which are based on state transition systems and make a clear distinction between probabilistic and nondeterministic choices. The pseudometrics are defined as the greatest fixpoint of a monotonic functional on the complete lattice of state metrics. A distinguished characteristic of this pseudometric lies in that it does not discount the future, which addresses some algorithmic challenges to compute the distance of two states in the model. We solve this problem by providing an approximation algorithm: up to any desired degree of accuracy epsiv, the distance can be approximated to within epsiv in time exponential in the size of the model and logarithmic in 1/epsiv. A key ingredient of our algorithm is to express a pseudometric being a post-fixpoint as the elementary sentence over real closed fields, which allows us to exploit Tar ski's decision procedure, together with binary search to approximate the behavioral distance.

    Or maybe not.

    I first recall hearing about behavioral metric analysis a long time ago and if memory serves it was an article published by NASA talking about trying to design space capsules in such a way as to be able to predict the humans reaction to specific events that were identical to, or at least resembled, previous events. Hence the probabilistic bit.

    While I have no references to list, I’m pretty sure that most of the research and application of the concept is not in the field of space exploration but rather advertising and marketing.

    There can be as many metrics I suppose as there are people wanting to track them, especially if you start blurring the lines of behavioral metrics with demographics. Again, a simple concept such as a person who did this before will likely do it again, becomes very complex when attempting to digitalize it and then un-digitalize it into something a human could take action upon.

    But as marketers, usually with limited time and resources as in the case of small online promotion firms, we need to focus on only the ones that increase our convertible traffic and/or make us more money. So from there it comes down to:

    #1. What can we get within the boundaries of what can we afford?

    #2. What of what we can get can we do something about within the boundaries of what we can afford?

     

    There are certainly times when knowing things like the time of the visit , geo-location, IP address, search history, where a prospect spends the majority of their time, who do they talk to about what and how often can come in pretty handy in making a feature, benefit, call to action presentation. It’s not difficult to see how any one of those things or any combination of those things could influence how you would display your presentation in the hopes of getting the most desired responses.

    Then comes the demographics which some would argue are even more important than the behavioral metrics. Where they live, how much money they make, what religion they are, what political affiliations they have, education level, what kind of car they drive, how much credit they have etc, etc,  etc.

    BUT LET’S GET REAL:

    As close as it appears anyone can tell, there are approx. 273 pages per domain on average

    http://www.boutell.com/newfaq/misc/sizeofweb.html

    Now regardless of how many pages YOU have, take a quick look at how many unique referrers you had this past week.

    I picked one of ours at random and checked. That domain last week had 1438 unique referrers from 970 unique IP’s. That particular domain has 114 pages. So that gives an average of 12.6 unique referrers per page within one week.

    SOOOOO, if the average unique referrers is 12.6  per page and the average domain has 273 pages, that would be 3440 unique referrers to try to figure out what to say to get the maximum conversions for each referrer. Now if you try to analyze just where the referrer came from geographically and it only took you 4 seconds to do that, you’d be looking at 13,760 seconds or 229.3 hours. Considering Mother Nature only allows each of us a total of 168 hours per week, that wouldn’t leave much time for eating, sleeping or bumping uglies with the old life partner now would it? Even foregoing all those creature comforts, you’d still be getting behind more  than 60 hours a week. YIKES!

    My point is simply that if you lack the bandwidth, technical ability and financial wherewithal to automate the entire analytical process based on selected criteria, then pay someone,(even if it’s you), to read the reports and THEN modify pages to enable you to split test a vast variety of displayed content, you ain’t gonna make it brother!

    If you do lack any of those things, then join the club. Pretty much all of us that have not gone public lack at least some of those resources. So what are our options?

    #1. Throw as much bullshit content and bullshit links at as many pages as our auto generator will belch out and be satisfied with a .02% conversion ratio, (which in this guru’s opinion is the major problem with the web today. The old, “if one is good, then a million must be better philosophy).

    #2. Be satisfied with building a web business at the speed of height, never really knowing what to change when or where, but always believing that if you just keep adding quality, original content,(whatever the hell that is), somehow you will magically win the day and eventually get financially rewarded for all your hard work and devotion,(hahahahahaha. Sometimes I crack myself up).

    #3. Eliminate the noise. Forget about all the stuff that consumes too much time or too much money and pinpoint what you can get fast and cheap and then focus on that to double your conversions. Once you have doubled your conversion ratio, THEN figure out your margin and go get more of the same traffic. 

    If you go for #3, all you really have to do is 2 simple things. Know what the referrer was, (the search term or where they came from such as a forum post, a blog, a newsletter, email, etc.), and what language they speak, (and even that is not as important as the referrers). Then show them what they expected to see when they got to your page.

    The 3 Second Back Button Boogie

    That’s it. I call it, eliminating the 3 second back button boogie.

    Just by following this simple process, I have increased specific pages conversions from single digits to over 70% !

    All you have to do is track your referrers so you know what your prospect was looking for and then show them that SPECIFIC content within 3 seconds of them hitting your page. That alone can increase your conversions dramatically.

    I’m not suggesting cloaking. I’m suggesting simple ad delivery or content management. The same thing major sites do when they know what IP you are coming from. Besides, when it comes to me running a legal business for my benefit and the benefit of my clients, guck foogle and the horse they rode in on!

    **************************************************************************

    >disclaimer<

    Guck foogle is a fictional phrase devised in the twisted mind of a fictional character and any association to any past or present actual persons or entities either living or dead, is unfortunate.

    ****************************************************************************************************

    In my next post, I intend to discuss exactly what the 3 second back button boogie is and how to avoid it using a unique philosophy and a cool little tool I’m going to soon release as a free open source project.

     

    Peach Y’all

    Da Guru

     

    Some pretty cool reference reading

    SEO Bounce Rates, Behavioral Metrics and the Birth of SEO Surfbot Nets

    Sphinn Discussion


     

     

     

    If you kids don’t quit jumpin on that bed I’m gonna git my belt and come in there and give you something to jump about!  

    | | #