We
would accomplish many more things if we did not think of them as impossible.
Vince Lombardi
I was more
impressed with the technology of search back in 1996 than I am today.
When I first
started playing around with Infoseek, Excite, Alta Vista, Hot Bot,
Webcrawler,(well, Ok. Webcrawler and Open Text --- not so much), and the other
now rotting carcasses of failed search based ad delivery systems, I was blown
away.
Millions of
pieces of data organized in a somewhat logical framework. Pages were often indexed
within minutes. Scalability seemed endless as each day they all grew by
hundreds of thousands of documents.
You could
cross reference. You could research. You could locate data that could fill the
largest libraries on the planet from the comfort of your chair and without
having to have a library card or pay late fees. It was amazing.
Granted it
was all text based. Period, (and even back then we all knew that would change),
and the algorithms were far too elementary. I mean if a guy like me could
figure them out ----- weeeelllllll
As for online
promotion and search marketing, I actually did fall off a log once when I was a
kid and placing on Infoseek for MLM, credit cards and online poker was easier.
And took about as long.
One of the first
things that bothered me about search engines was the way they forced terrible
conversions. Back then the index page reigned supreme and if your meta refresh
tags were done properly,(what an oxy-moron), your domain name could pop up in
top 10 for literally hundreds of related terms. Shoes.com could place #2 for
gold shoelaces when the shoes.com/goldshoelaces.html page was three levels
deep.
From a
marketers viewpoint, it wasn’t all bad. I mean which is better
1000 hits
with a 1% conversion
Or 100 hits
with a 10% conversion?
Answer ---WHO CARES!
It wasn’t
until 1998/99 that “doorway pages” started coming into fashion. Not because
they didn’t make sense before, but because engines were starting to realize
that humans had too many choices of where to look for data and if they did not
deliver a better perception of relevancy for specific searches, the aforementioned
human would simply move on to Excite, or Hot Bot or Northern Lights, (one of
the first to actually invest money in an attempt to raise the bar on relevancy). So they all got better at reading text and
comparing it to a text based query and voila! A cloaked, automated doorway page CRAParama was unleashed upon the straining storage resources of all search
engines, major and minor alike.
That Was Then and This Is
Now
Then came
Google and the world changed.
To be
perfectly honest, I have always been much more impressed by Google’s marketing
prowess than with the quality of their search engine based on page rank. We had
noticed Alta Vista was working with link analysis before Google had even
started selling ads. What Google did was actually make it work. But even back
then with only 50 or so Phd’s, I kind of expected a little more.
So now
Google has become the undisputed leader. Fine. And once PR was refined a little and then reverse engineered a lot by the same people who had
figured out the text based stuff that came before Page Rank, and then some hick
from Oklahoma started marketing links, (boy, did THAT piss off Google!), PR
started working for individual interior pages based on a combination of text
plus all that democratic nature of the web crap.
MORE CRAPARAMA!
Now it
actually became even easier to auto-generate the kind of content we have all
come to accept.
{grab a suitcase – we’re going on a
side trip}
The above scenario is
just one of the many reasons that I assert there is really no such thing as
search engine spam. While
the engines may not have invented the term, they certainly jumped on the self promotional
bandwagon and made crap not only easy but revenue generating as well. Search
engine spam survives only as the engines allow.
So to me, I
have never been amazed by anything that has happened and called a leap forward
within the search engines self promotional press releases, “leaks” or blatant
blog posts as I was when I first visited Infoseek some 13 years ago.
Even taking
into account all the social media hype, buying, (or rather gobbling), up a lot
of tech companies, tracking and analyzing everything you do online, (and off
BTW), and delivering personalized, geo targeted, demographically influenced
results for every search,(Still only a glimmer in some ad salesman’s eye but coming at a blinding pace),
those things are all about improving an AD DELIVERY experience and not a
searching and FINDING relevant to a specific query experience.
That
actually doesn’t bother me in the least. In fact, it is the way it should be
except for one little aspect. The proportion of profit to relevancy improvement
is getting a little out of whack.
The ad
buying, delivering and tracking technology seems to be progressing at an
incredible rate. I am as amazed at how fast the ad delivery systems are improving
as I was when I first started diddleing Infoseek.
So, ready to
have your gears shpunn?
It’s because
of the focus on ad delivery that any engine attempts to improve relevancy. Why?
Because you finding answers to your queries is what keeps you from looking somewhere
else for the answer and you looking THERE is what offers the opportunity to
display ads that they have spent much time, money and energy trying to learn
which one YOU are most likely to respond to with a click of your cyber wallet.
What this
means to anyone who cares to look is a huge shift in conventional wisdom
thinking.
Conventional
wisdom has us all trying to build pages that satisfy a search engine’s algorithm
to determine relevancy. That is all based around the concept that
#1.
Relevancy is all that matters to a search engine when in fact REVENUE is all
that matters and that makes the machine an ad delivery system and not a
relevancy delivery system
#2. That a search engine takes humans where the search engine tells them is the best place for the human to go.
The truth is:
HUMANS tell the SEARCH ENGINES where to go
I know that
is going to be VERY difficult for some to accept and that is fine. There is
nothing wrong with most people trying to satisfy search engines and thinking
that you can influence a search machine any easier than you can influence a
water pik!
Sure you can
twist some screws, add thicker wires to deliver more current, and even replace
the head to make it sphinn the opposite way. But at the end of the day, it is
still going to squirt water between your teeth because that is what it was
built to do. If it doesn't - it's broke!
Search engines
are built to deliver revenue generating advertisements to HUMANS and that is
why the secret to ultimate domination of organic traffic generating placements
is to remember that search engines follow HUMANS and not the other way around.
You may be
thinking, so – which came first the chicken or the egg. How do I get organic
search traffic if I have to get people searching for me in the first place?
It’s not as
hard as you think. Influencing people is actually cheaper, faster and easier
than trying to influence search engines. http://www.seobook.com/archives/001819.shtml
I’m close to
finishing my next blog post called “How
To Beat the 3 Second Back Button Boogie”. In that article I’ll start showing
you ways to get people to force the engines to follow them and it can start with
what you do with people when they get to your site. That is one of the easiest
ways to start understanding the concept that search engines follow people!
Peach Y’all
The anti-seo
seo Guru
I
swear daddy I don’t know what happened to your magazines that were under your tool
box out in the garage